Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00893
Original file (BC 2014 00893.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00893
			COUNSEL:  NONE
			HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His active duty tour in Afghanistan be documented on his DD Form 
214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He served in Afghanistan from Nov 03-Apr 04 and his record is in 
error because it is missing his combat and war time status.  He 
believes the Board should find it in the interest of justice to 
consider his untimely application because he should get credit 
for his combat service.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 7 Jun 00, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force.  
 
On 6 Jun 04, the applicant received a honorable discharge, and 
was credited with 4 years of active service.   


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial.  A review of his Master Personnel 
Records and submitted documentation failed to provide 
substantiation of foreign-service time in Afghanistan.

The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 28 Mar 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 26 Feb 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 12 Mar 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Mar 14.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05257

    Original file (BC 2013 05257.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05257 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). There is no official documentation in the applicant’s official military record verifying he was in the area of eligibility for an aggregate of six months in support of the Vietnam Armed Forces. While the applicant contends that the fact that he was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00580

    Original file (BC 2014 00580.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for awards in support of Operation NICKEL GRASS. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting correction of the applicant’s records to reflect his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04537

    Original file (BC-2012-04537.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends approval, indicating there is evidence of an error. A review of the applicant’s Master Personnel Records and documentation submitted indicates the applicant volunteered for duty in Saudi Arabia as part...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01292

    Original file (BC 2014 01292.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01292 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) for his service in Thailand. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The VSM is awarded for members who, during the period 4 Jul 65 through 28 Mar 73, deployed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03656

    Original file (BC-2010-03656.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03656 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he served in Vietnam. DPAPP states a review of the applicant’s master personnel records and the documentation he provided do not substantiate he had foreign service time in Vietnam. Therefore, we agree with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05271

    Original file (BC 2013 05271.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Vietnam service. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends disapproval of the applicant’s request to correct his records to reflect service in Thailand.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00008

    Original file (BC-2012-00008.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00008 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM) for service at Osan Air Base, Korea during the period Jun 62 to Jul 62. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01435

    Original file (BC-2011-01435.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01435 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 28 Oct 11 for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02320

    Original file (BC 2014 02320.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02320 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he served in Vietnam. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: His AF Form 7 and Flight Order substantiates his service in country in Vietnam (Exhibit E). We note the applicant has provided excerpts from his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00026

    Original file (BC-2011-00026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant served at Kadena Air Base (AB), Japan, from 20 Sep 67 to 22 Mar 68, for a total of six months and four days. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The documentation provided to date clearly shows flight time during both TDYs, in 67-68 and 68-69. Someone must know KC-135 crew chiefs flew with their aircraft on most missions at that time.